Monday, September 23, 2013

Commentary | Ivey Admits Edge Sorting

Ivey Versus Genting

In May 2103 Phil Ivey sued Crockfords to get his winning of £7.8millon paid up. Crockford withheld Ivey's payment by accusing Ivey of cheating and edge sorting began to make big news among gambling fans. With Ivey admitting to being an "advantage player" in his recent court submission, SavySeph covered some legal points that favor Ivey.

Casinos will always see edge sorting as a scam because the foreknowledge aspect gives gambler with good strategy a superior winning edge. Specialized gambling consultants do not see any foul play in being an advantage player. The outcome of the case will depend on which of these two sides the court takes. SavySeph uses a clear cut edge sorting scam to separate cheating and players possessing a winning edge.

While Genting Group or Crockfords thinks they could get away with not honoring bets due to faulty equipment, SavySeph cited a classic case where the casino should be responsible for their own equipment. I could only shake my head in disgust in the disgrace that Genting Group, my homeland casino, had landed themselves into.

More on SavySeph's Webpage.



8 comments:

  1. Casinos do not need to bully gamblers. They already have a strong arsenal at their disposal.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Phil Ivey should sue for consequential damages too.


      Hey guys, I think SavySeph analysis should be made aware to Ivey.

      Delete
    2. Chairman Faceless, Heylong is right as a fraternity of gamblers we should share with Phil.

      Delete
    3. Right. Any ideas how to reach Ivey?

      Delete
    4. +SavySeph, I am getting comments that your pages in general are too short. Newbie especially could not catch things between the lines.

      Delete
  2. women of the world ... oops. All gamblers unite to give Phil Ivey the moral support.

    ReplyDelete
  3. While casino sulks by refusing payment, gamblers sulkiness benefit the casino.

    ReplyDelete